Grading Systems

Mr. Alderson uses a grading method unique in comparison to any of the many classes I've partaken in. Like other good educators, Mr. Alderson strives to teach students with the goal of reaching academic success, but the path in which his students get there is not what I, or many other experienced educators, are used to.

Learning goals are set by Mr. Alderson based on Washington's Essential Academic Learning Requirements (EALRs) and Grade Level Expectations (GLEs). Students' assignment and tests are graded according to proof of competence. Unlike common classroom norms, Mr. Alderson doesn't penalize students for turning in assignments after their assigned due date, only for lack of effort and interest to master the content. Students have the chance to resubmit work until the student has proven to fully understand the material.

I'm very interested to try out Mr. Alderson's grading method in my own classroom--with some tweaks. I am a strong believer of teaching my future students not only academics, but also proper work ethic, including time management. I think that giving students who put in effort to create at least a well thought-out draft in time for an assignments' due date deserve an opportunity to re-submit work. I will need to establish boundaries of what is considered "effort" and what is not, but giving students the chance to reach content mastery as well as time management and responsibility will create a positive learning environment.

Mr. Alderson's grading theory is a prime example that successful teachers can and will create their own space using what works, rather than what is expected.